Drone strikes are “counter-productive”, former Obama security adviser

Although it is obvious to lots of people that a “thanatopolitics” – the mobilization of death to secure life – is doomed to failure, when U.S officials acknowledge this shortcoming, it crests in the news.

Consider Michael Boyle, who was on Obama’s counter-terrorist group in the run up to his election in 2008. He has come out to say that drone strikes are “encouraging a new arms race that will empower current and future rivals and lay the foundations for an international system that is increasingly violent”, in a story published by the Guardian.

He added that the reliance on drone technology was having “adverse strategic effects that have not been properly weighed against the tactical gains associated with killing terrorists”, and that most Americans remained “unaware of the scale of the drone programme … and the destruction it has caused in their name”.

Recall Mitt Romney’s key foreign policy quip in the 2012 Presidential election – “we can’t kill our way out of this mess”.

Indeed.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in White House Politics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Drone strikes are “counter-productive”, former Obama security adviser

  1. Obama Drone Control got you scared?
    Obama’s choice of John Brennan for CIA not your
    choice?
    How about signing the online White House Petition
    to End Drone Strikes Killing Children and
    innocent civilians?
    http://wh.gov/UKpQ

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s