A report by The Remote Control Project explores the billions of dollars’ worth of procurements by the U.S. military’s Special Operations Command. Unsurprisingly, the military-industrial complex is fully integrated in “off-the-radar” missions.
Corporations are integrated into some of the most sensitive aspects of these activities: flying drones and overseeing target acquisition, facilitating communications between forward operating locations and central command hubs, interrogating prisoners and translating captured material, and managing the flow of information from regional populations to the U.S.military presence and back again.
The Intercept reports on one NSA program that allows domestic law enforcements agencies–including the FBI and DEA–to search through its trove of metadata for “foreign intelligence.” As the article notes, this includes “incidental” data on U.S. citizens. As I mentioned earlier this week, although the scale of this dragnet is unprecedented, the actual procedure of information sharing is nothing new – and dates back to the SHAMROCK and MINERVA operations throughout the Cold War.
Lots of well-illustrated maps over at the NYT
This map represents botched SWAT and paramilitary police raids in the U.S. Website and story here.
This article covers an important historical precursor to contemporary NSA surveillance: Project SHAMROCK, the name for the NSA’s interception of telegrams passing over US soil between 1945 and 1975.
Three telegraph companies handed over tapes of their telegram data to the Fort Meade spy agency. This wholesale “upstream surveillance” was then processed and passed on to other law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI, under Project MINERVA. Civil rights activists in particular were targeted and placed on an extensive “watch list.” This was the time of J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI after all, during which time “national threats” could be little more than civil disturbances.
The pivotal Senate Church Committee report can be found here, and it provides an impressive amount of detail and context on the first instance of mass (electronic) surveillance in U.S. history.